ISSN: 2161-0711

Medicina comunitaria y educación para la salud

Acceso abierto

Nuestro grupo organiza más de 3000 Series de conferencias Eventos cada año en EE. UU., Europa y América. Asia con el apoyo de 1.000 sociedades científicas más y publica más de 700 Acceso abierto Revistas que contienen más de 50.000 personalidades eminentes, científicos de renombre como miembros del consejo editorial.

Revistas de acceso abierto que ganan más lectores y citas
700 revistas y 15 000 000 de lectores Cada revista obtiene más de 25 000 lectores

Indexado en
  • Índice Copérnico
  • Google Académico
  • sherpa romeo
  • Revista GenámicaBuscar
  • SeguridadIluminado
  • Búsqueda de referencia
  • Universidad Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • publones
  • Fundación de Ginebra para la educación y la investigación médicas
  • Pub Europeo
  • ICMJE
Comparte esta página

Abstracto

Community-Academic Collaboration and Ethics-Concepts, Principles, and Processes: Building on the Center for Promoting Health and Health Equity-Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health

John R. Stone

This paper employs a literature review, an ethical/philosophical analysis, and authors experience to develop a framework for guiding community-academic partnerships in collaborating to pursue health equity. The framework involves dynamic and interactive categories of Core Concepts, Guiding Principles, and Key Processes. Core Concepts are that collaboration involves partners in-relation who walk and explore together, ethics involved throughout. Guiding Principles are to honor community rights and well-being, primarily promote community health equity, secondarily advance academic interests, ensure justice throughout, and sustain principles involving mutuality (respect, transparency, authenticity, trustworthiness, care, humility (cultural and epistemic/knowledge), and solidarity). Key Processes are periodic reflexivity with framework critical review; deliberation, discussion, and decision; and negotiation and conflict resolution. The literature review only addressed publications in English. Most articles focused on the United States, as does much of the authors experience. Thus, the analysis could overlook aspects that a more global examination might reveal. Thus, the framework is provisional.