Nuestro grupo organiza más de 3000 Series de conferencias Eventos cada año en EE. UU., Europa y América. Asia con el apoyo de 1.000 sociedades científicas más y publica más de 700 Acceso abierto Revistas que contienen más de 50.000 personalidades eminentes, científicos de renombre como miembros del consejo editorial.

Revistas de acceso abierto que ganan más lectores y citas
700 revistas y 15 000 000 de lectores Cada revista obtiene más de 25 000 lectores

Abstracto

Comparison of Different Diffusion Weighted MR Techniques in the Diagnosis of the Middle Ear Cholesteatoma?Value of Non-Echo Planar Diffusion-Weighted MRI

Tomasz Zatoński, Marek Sąsiadek and Anna Zimny

Objective: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is essential to detect middle ear cholesteatoma, especially using Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). The aim of the study was to analyse the value of two different DWI techniques (Echoplanar imaging (EPI) and non-EPI) in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma.

Methods: Our material consisted of 32 patients with a clinical suspicion of cholesteatoma who underwent Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the temporal bone using both EPI and non-EPI DWI. Only studies with histopathological results were included. Two independent readers retrospectively analysed MR images. Intra-and interobserver agreements as well sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values of two DWI sequences were assessed.

Results: Using non-EPI DWI all cholesteatomas were correctly diagnosed by both readers with no false negative nor inconclusive cases and with only one false positive result. Non-EPI DWI revealed high interobserver agreement (ĸ=1) and high correlation with histopathological results (r=0.895). EPI DWI misdiagnosed 27-31% of cholesteatomas (false negative results), showing also significantly low interobserver agreement (ĸ=0.373) and low correlation with histopathological results (r=0.328 for reader 1 and r=0.267 for reader 2). Non-EPI DWI revealed very high sensitivity (100%), specificity (83.3%), as well as NPV (100%), and PPV (96.3%) in comparison to EPI DWI which showed lower sensitivity (69.2%), specificity (66.6-83.3%), NPV (33.3-38.4%) and PPV (90-94.7%).

Conclusion: Compared to EPI, non-EPI DWI is a highly reliable method of detecting middle ear cholesteatoma with high sensitivity, specificity and interobserver agreement which make this technique very useful in the clinical settings regardless of the pre- or postoperative state of the ear.