ISSN: 2155-6199

Revista de biorremediación y biodegradación

Acceso abierto

Nuestro grupo organiza más de 3000 Series de conferencias Eventos cada año en EE. UU., Europa y América. Asia con el apoyo de 1.000 sociedades científicas más y publica más de 700 Acceso abierto Revistas que contienen más de 50.000 personalidades eminentes, científicos de renombre como miembros del consejo editorial.

Revistas de acceso abierto que ganan más lectores y citas
700 revistas y 15 000 000 de lectores Cada revista obtiene más de 25 000 lectores

Indexado en
  • Índice de fuentes CAS (CASSI)
  • Índice Copérnico
  • Google Académico
  • sherpa romeo
  • Abrir puerta J
  • Revista GenámicaBuscar
  • Claves Académicas
  • TOC de revistas
  • InvestigaciónBiblia
  • Infraestructura Nacional del Conocimiento de China (CNKI)
  • Directorio de publicaciones periódicas de Ulrich
  • Acceso a la Investigación Global en Línea en Agricultura (AGORA)
  • Búsqueda de referencia
  • Universidad Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • Catálogo en línea SWB
  • publones
  • Fundación de Ginebra para la educación y la investigación médicas
  • MIAR
  • ICMJE
Comparte esta página

Abstracto

Critical Analysis of Two Respirometric Methods for Solid Substrates Based On Continuous and Semi-Continuous Aeration

Rada EC, Ragazzi M and Venturi M

In the sector of respirometry applied to solid waste many tools are available. Moreover, methods for assessing the oxygen consumption can be significantly different. In Italy, the sector is characterized by the adoption of dynamic approaches that are preferred to the static ones. In this paper, a comparison between the two respirometers more adopted in Italy is presented. The first one is the Costech respirometer, with continuous aeration and without temperature control. The second one is the AIR-nl respirometer, with temperature control and a semicontinuous aeration based on the principle of avoiding limiting conditions of oxygen. Results were obtained during an experimental research that involved on one hand the construction of an analytical model for evaluating the Respirometric Index (RI) for various substrates and on the other, the critical analysis of the obtained measurements. In this paper, the relationship between the output of tests conducted in parallel with two different instruments on the same samples is analyzed. Some differences between the results of the measurements and obtainable parameters (RI24) are underlined. Considerations on reference moisture, temperature role, and respirometric index calculation method allow the understanding of the characteristics of the two methods in more detail.