Nuestro grupo organiza más de 3000 Series de conferencias Eventos cada año en EE. UU., Europa y América. Asia con el apoyo de 1.000 sociedades científicas más y publica más de 700 Acceso abierto Revistas que contienen más de 50.000 personalidades eminentes, científicos de renombre como miembros del consejo editorial.
Revistas de acceso abierto que ganan más lectores y citas
700 revistas y 15 000 000 de lectores Cada revista obtiene más de 25 000 lectores
Kimchi Jiu
Anesthesia, a cornerstone of modern medicine, is designed to alleviate pain and provide comfort during surgical procedures. However, an intriguing paradox exists within this medical marvel—the experience of pain before anesthesia takes full effect, often referred to as "the pain of induction." This phenomenon has captivated the attention of medical professionals, researchers, and ethicists alike. The mechanism underlying the pain of induction remains incompletely understood but is believed to stem from the rapid onset of anesthesia agents. This paradoxical pain experience varies among patients, influenced by factors such as anesthetic agents used, individual pain thresholds, and consciousness levels before anesthesia induction.
Efforts to manage and minimize this pre-induction pain have led to the development of patient-centered approaches, including premedication and alternative anesthetic agents. Ethical considerations arise regarding the informed consent process and the ethical obligation to minimize such pain. As the field of anesthesia continues to evolve, researchers delve deeper into the neurobiology of pain and consciousness, offering hope for more refined anesthesia techniques tailored to individual patients. This abstract underscores the need for continued exploration of the pain of anesthesia induction, aiming to enhance patient experiences and contribute to the advancement of anesthesia practice.