ISSN: 2155-6105

Revista de investigación y terapia de adicciones

Acceso abierto

Nuestro grupo organiza más de 3000 Series de conferencias Eventos cada año en EE. UU., Europa y América. Asia con el apoyo de 1.000 sociedades científicas más y publica más de 700 Acceso abierto Revistas que contienen más de 50.000 personalidades eminentes, científicos de renombre como miembros del consejo editorial.

Revistas de acceso abierto que ganan más lectores y citas
700 revistas y 15 000 000 de lectores Cada revista obtiene más de 25 000 lectores

Indexado en
  • Índice de fuentes CAS (CASSI)
  • Índice Copérnico
  • Google Académico
  • sherpa romeo
  • Abrir puerta J
  • Revista GenámicaBuscar
  • Claves Académicas
  • TOC de revistas
  • SeguridadIluminado
  • Infraestructura Nacional del Conocimiento de China (CNKI)
  • Biblioteca de revistas electrónicas
  • Búsqueda de referencia
  • Universidad Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • Catálogo en línea SWB
  • Biblioteca Virtual de Biología (vifabio)
  • publones
  • Fundación de Ginebra para la educación y la investigación médicas
  • Pub Europeo
  • ICMJE
Comparte esta página

Abstracto

How Addiction Changes You: A Clinical Study on Substance Abuse, Attachment Style and Reflective Function in Borderline Personality Disorder

Guido Nosari*,  Boso Marianna, Sacco Giulia, Urru Anna, Valentina Ciappolino, Tiraboschi Giorgio, Monti Maria Cristina and Edgardo Caverzasi

Background: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Substance Use Disorder (SUD) co-morbidity, often described as “Dual Diagnosis” (DD), is a severe and complex condition. Attachment abnormalities and Reflective Functioning (RF) impairments are crucial in BPD, but may be also implicated in SUD. Aim of the present study is to investigate psychopathological dimensions, attachment style and the RF in two distinct groups of patients, respectively affected by SUD with BPD and by SUD without BPD.

Methods: 2 groups of subjects with diagnosis of “SUD with BPD” (40 patients) and for “SUD without BPD” (30 patients), were included and assessed with the Addiction Severity Index (ASI), Adult Attachment Questionnaire (AAQ), Reflective Function Questionnaire (RFQ).

Results: Significant differences between both groups were shown in pharmacological therapy (p<0.0001), substitutive therapy (p=0.025), suicide attempts (p=0.005), self-harming behavior (p<0.001), trauma (p=0.003). ASI reported significant differences in social relationships (p=0.0115) and psychiatric condition (p=0.0003). RFQ showed statistically significant differences on the Uncertainty Scale (p=0.0340). The SUD with BPD group showed a prevalent dismissing attachment style (58%), with a low percentage of disorganized attachment style (3%). The SUD without BPD group showed a prevalent secure style (47%), followed by the dismissing style (30%).

Conclusions: A comprehensive assessment in all SUD subjects with psychiatric symptoms and history of psychological trauma is crucial, since it allows to start a tailored intervention for DD patients, aimed to minimize the poor outcome related with this condition. Additional psychotherapy could be proposed for SUD patients with a dismissive attachment style.