ISSN: 2155-6105

Revista de investigación y terapia de adicciones

Acceso abierto

Nuestro grupo organiza más de 3000 Series de conferencias Eventos cada año en EE. UU., Europa y América. Asia con el apoyo de 1.000 sociedades científicas más y publica más de 700 Acceso abierto Revistas que contienen más de 50.000 personalidades eminentes, científicos de renombre como miembros del consejo editorial.

Revistas de acceso abierto que ganan más lectores y citas
700 revistas y 15 000 000 de lectores Cada revista obtiene más de 25 000 lectores

Indexado en
  • Índice de fuentes CAS (CASSI)
  • Índice Copérnico
  • Google Académico
  • sherpa romeo
  • Abrir puerta J
  • Revista GenámicaBuscar
  • Claves Académicas
  • TOC de revistas
  • SeguridadIluminado
  • Infraestructura Nacional del Conocimiento de China (CNKI)
  • Biblioteca de revistas electrónicas
  • Búsqueda de referencia
  • Universidad Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • Catálogo en línea SWB
  • Biblioteca Virtual de Biología (vifabio)
  • publones
  • Fundación de Ginebra para la educación y la investigación médicas
  • Pub Europeo
  • ICMJE
Comparte esta página

Abstracto

Peer Support for Opioid Use Disorders: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Moderated Text-Based Group Chat Application

Caroline R. Scherzer, Megan L. Ranney, John Patena, Ernestine Jennings, Kirsten J. Langdon, Francesca L. Beaudoin , Francesca L. Beaudoin

Purpose: To elucidate key elements surrounding acceptability/feasibility, usability, and features of a smartphone-based mobile peer support application for adults engaged in treatment for opioid use disorder.

Methods: We recruited adults engaged in treatment for opioid use disorder, during the course of usual care, at a hospital-affiliated outpatient clinic. Participants piloted a smartphone-based mobile peer support application for six weeks and completed semi-structured interviews exploring usability and acceptability of the mobile platform. Interviews were conducted by trained interviewers, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. A coding structure was iteratively developed using Framework Analysis focusing on feasibility and acceptability of the app and recommendations for improvement.

Results: Saturation was reached after 20 interviews (mean age 43.1; 60% white; 15% Hispanic/Latinx; 55% late in recovery; 55% high engagement users). Qualitatively, participants articulated (1) Acceptability/feasibility themes: benefits, challenges, feature recommendations; and (2) Emergent themes: support and alternative treatment option. Quantitative measures indicated feasibility with a total of 2,436 messages sent over the study period.

Conclusion: Adults engaged in medication for opioid use disorder expressed high degree of user satisfaction about a smartphone-based mobile peer support application. Incorporating thematic results on participants’ experiences and interactions with the peer support application and the application’s role in recovery efforts can inform development of future mobile-peer support applications for adults engaged in medication for opioid use disorder. Concerns about activity in peer support groups may be addressed through structured support from a moderator or designatedtimeframes to go online.