Nuestro grupo organiza más de 3000 Series de conferencias Eventos cada año en EE. UU., Europa y América. Asia con el apoyo de 1.000 sociedades científicas más y publica más de 700 Acceso abierto Revistas que contienen más de 50.000 personalidades eminentes, científicos de renombre como miembros del consejo editorial.

Revistas de acceso abierto que ganan más lectores y citas
700 revistas y 15 000 000 de lectores Cada revista obtiene más de 25 000 lectores

Indexado en
  • Índice de fuentes CAS (CASSI)
  • Índice Copérnico
  • Google Académico
  • sherpa romeo
  • Abrir puerta J
  • Revista GenámicaBuscar
  • Claves Académicas
  • TOC de revistas
  • InvestigaciónBiblia
  • Infraestructura Nacional del Conocimiento de China (CNKI)
  • Directorio de publicaciones periódicas de Ulrich
  • Búsqueda de referencia
  • Universidad Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • Catálogo en línea SWB
  • publones
  • Fundación de Ginebra para la educación y la investigación médicas
  • Pub Europeo
  • ICMJE
Comparte esta página

Abstracto

Predicting Radiation Doses Based on Time to Emesis in Nuclear Terrorism

Zubin Hilton

The standard mistake, certainty span, explicitness and awareness, and Collector Working Trademark bend are utilized to describe the vulnerability of the portion forecast. Using data on time to emesis, the dose prediction has a relative error of about 200%. Therefore, the 95% confidence interval is approximately if D is the dose assessment. In the event of a nuclear terrorism incident, our evaluation of the precision is used to calculate the probabilities for medical triage and management. A lack of consideration for individuals who do not vomit, differences between the conditions under which the data were obtained and the conditions under which they are likely to be used, and the potential for the incidence of vomiting to be altered by factors unrelated to radiation exposure such as psychogenic factors and the use of emetic agents are additional indicators that the utilization of time to emesis for triage presents additional challenges. In conclusion, while the time to emesis method is quick and inexpensive for estimating radiation dose, it should be used with caution due to its imprecision and the possibility of a high rate of false positives. More solid strategies for some time later appraisal of radiation portion are expected to supplement the utilization of time to emesis.