ISSN: 2157-7617

Revista de Ciencias de la Tierra y Cambio Climático

Acceso abierto

Nuestro grupo organiza más de 3000 Series de conferencias Eventos cada año en EE. UU., Europa y América. Asia con el apoyo de 1.000 sociedades científicas más y publica más de 700 Acceso abierto Revistas que contienen más de 50.000 personalidades eminentes, científicos de renombre como miembros del consejo editorial.

Revistas de acceso abierto que ganan más lectores y citas
700 revistas y 15 000 000 de lectores Cada revista obtiene más de 25 000 lectores

Indexado en
  • Índice de fuentes CAS (CASSI)
  • Índice Copérnico
  • Google Académico
  • sherpa romeo
  • Acceso en Línea a la Investigación en Medio Ambiente (OARE)
  • Abrir puerta J
  • Revista GenámicaBuscar
  • TOC de revistas
  • Directorio de publicaciones periódicas de Ulrich
  • Acceso a la Investigación Global en Línea en Agricultura (AGORA)
  • Centro Internacional de Agricultura y Biociencias (CABI)
  • Búsqueda de referencia
  • Universidad Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • Invocaciones de proquest
  • Catálogo en línea SWB
  • publones
  • Pub Europeo
  • ICMJE
Comparte esta página

Abstracto

Preventing Climate Change by Modifying the Ocean?s Albedo

Jonah Ezekiel

Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is a proposed solution to climate change, which involves reflecting sunlight away from the Earth to cool the planet. Currently, the major proposed forms of accomplishing this are complicated, only theoretical, and fraught with negative external consequences. This project examines a novel approach to SRM: Introducing reflective particles to the surface of the ocean. Data was collected through experimentation with bodies of saltwater with variable quantities of a specific reflective compound, TiO2 (Titania), dispersed on the surface. The difference in the rate of temperature change when exposed to a constant thermal radiation source was measured. Thermodynamic and climate relationships and known values were then used to ultimately calculate the quantity of Titania that would be needed to counterbalance the radiative forcing effects of current and projected climate change. These results alongside other research were used to consider the external consequences of this form of SRM, and finally to consider its legitimacy in relation to conventional climate solutions and other SRM options. While more research is needed to make full conclusions, it was found that this method would likely be more expensive than other proposed SRM forms, though substantially less expensive than conventional emission reduction solutions, and that its external negative impact on the environment could be less pronounced than other SRM options.